User
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email?
May 24, 2012, 08:47:26 AM
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Latest Poll
What is the main type of machine you use to surf the site?
Desktop
112 (28%)
Laptop
158 (40%)
iPhone
51 (13%)
Android phone
29 (7%)
Tablet
24 (6%)
Other
14 (3%)
Total Voters: 287
Commencal Owners Club
Forum
General Category
General Discussion
Is 2 x 10 really the way??
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
« previous
next »
Pages:
[
1
]
2
Author
Topic: Is 2 x 10 really the way?? (Read 979 times)
100mphplus
Meta
Posts: 848
Live the Dream - Whistler 2012 Ticket2rideBC.com
Is 2 x 10 really the way??
«
on:
June 21, 2010, 11:47:14 AM »
Just recovering from Mayhem and there was one seriously long uphill pedal that had us mere mortals with the 3 x 9 in their granny rings at times and I must say I noticed a few people with the 2 x 10 pushing up???
Logged
Sponsored by;
www.ticket2ridebc.com
- for a 5% discount on your 2012 Whistler Holiday quote the code 'T2R01'
'08 Meta 666, '09 Super 4, '11 Supreme DH V3, '12 Meta AM1
galaxy
Normal
Posts: 34
Re: Is 2 x 10 really the way??
«
Reply #1 on:
June 21, 2010, 01:06:05 PM »
IMO this is physical strength and endurance, then 2x10 or 3x9 issue which makes the difference ...
And even with 3x9 you can always switch front from 22 to 32 and push harder
«
Last Edit: June 21, 2010, 01:08:07 PM by galaxy
»
Logged
mc
Administrator
Meta
Posts: 1526
Re: Is 2 x 10 really the way??
«
Reply #2 on:
June 21, 2010, 01:09:17 PM »
You can have as many or as few gears as you want, but if you've not got the fitness or skill to use them, then they're useless.
Logged
www.uk-mtb.com
100mphplus
Meta
Posts: 848
Live the Dream - Whistler 2012 Ticket2rideBC.com
Re: Is 2 x 10 really the way??
«
Reply #3 on:
June 21, 2010, 01:25:08 PM »
They did look the kind that would fall into the 'all the gear and no idea' category
Also saw lots of xc whippets with the one ring and chain device up front set up, which tbh I don't see the point of either as they were a ferkin rolling road block liability when I was spinning out my 42 x 11 top gear ratio down the 3 long descents.
Don't you just love fashion whores
Logged
Sponsored by;
www.ticket2ridebc.com
- for a 5% discount on your 2012 Whistler Holiday quote the code 'T2R01'
'08 Meta 666, '09 Super 4, '11 Supreme DH V3, '12 Meta AM1
McMeta666
Flame
Posts: 336
Rider of the bike that should not be
Re: Is 2 x 10 really the way??
«
Reply #4 on:
June 21, 2010, 01:44:21 PM »
Alot of its fitness or the lack of it. I ran 2x9 for along time and pretty much never pushed even on my demo i can pedal up most things, it is bloody hard going though
Logged
iain1775
Moderator
Meta
Posts: 3800
Re: Is 2 x 10 really the way??
«
Reply #5 on:
June 21, 2010, 02:13:47 PM »
was the 2x10 Sram XX then?
is the X0/x9 and x7 2x10 even out yet?
If it was XX then they where probably pushing because despite having light expensive bikes their wallets are obviously holding them back with the weight of all that spare cash they must have to be able to afford XX prices
There is no nicer way to treat your blingy full carbon uber expensive bike than take it out for a nice walk though really shows your caring side, even better if you can let it off the lead to chase the squirrels
Logged
2008 Commencal Meta 5.5.1, 2009 Commencal VIP Flame Titane, 1996 Voodoo Hoodoo, 2009 Trek X0-1 Cyclocross, 2004ish On One Inbred (fell off the back of a car!)
http://vimeo.com/user2099725
mc
Administrator
Meta
Posts: 1526
Re: Is 2 x 10 really the way??
«
Reply #6 on:
June 21, 2010, 02:18:08 PM »
And there was me managing to avoid using All the gear no idea in my first post.
Logged
www.uk-mtb.com
weeksy
Flame
Posts: 481
Re: Is 2 x 10 really the way??
«
Reply #7 on:
June 21, 2010, 02:39:27 PM »
Quote from: 100mphplus on June 21, 2010, 01:25:08 PM
They did look the kind that would fall into the 'all the gear and no idea' category
Also saw lots of xc whippets with the one ring and chain device up front set up, which tbh I don't see the point of either as they were a ferkin rolling road block liability when I was spinning out my 42 x 11 top gear ratio down the 3 long descents.
Don't you just love fashion whores
Woo hoo.. i'm a fashion whore
Logged
Ant
Meta
Posts: 1468
Re: Is 2 x 10 really the way??
«
Reply #8 on:
June 21, 2010, 02:48:07 PM »
Quote from: iain1775 on June 21, 2010, 02:13:47 PM
was the 2x10 Sram XX then?
is the X0/x9 and x7 2x10 even out yet?
If it was XX then they where probably pushing because despite having light expensive bikes their wallets are obviously holding them back with the weight of all that spare cash they must have to be able to afford XX prices
There is no nicer way to treat your blingy full carbon uber expensive bike than take it out for a nice walk though really shows your caring side, even better if you can let it off the lead to chase the squirrels
the 2x10 could be anything, Roadies have used 2x10 (doubles and compacts) for ages. They could just be using Roady mechs/chains with a cheap SLX 10sp shifter. Or Sram XX. Normal MTB shifters for the front, and the roady stuff on the rear.
Logged
www.AnthonyWillett.com
100mphplus
Meta
Posts: 848
Live the Dream - Whistler 2012 Ticket2rideBC.com
Re: Is 2 x 10 really the way??
«
Reply #9 on:
June 21, 2010, 03:00:45 PM »
What I was noticing first was the SRAM cassette as it has a distinctive design and then the front two rings.
Had a look at the Shimano 30 Sp SLX and XT on the Madison stand, 10 x 3 with a 22/32/42 front and 11/38 rear, we reckoned you could do near vertical with that low ratio
Logged
Sponsored by;
www.ticket2ridebc.com
- for a 5% discount on your 2012 Whistler Holiday quote the code 'T2R01'
'08 Meta 666, '09 Super 4, '11 Supreme DH V3, '12 Meta AM1
bong69uk
bong one (and a bit) star special
Meta
Posts: 3211
Re: Is 2 x 10 really the way??
«
Reply #10 on:
June 22, 2010, 12:23:27 AM »
WOW...i started to read this but became rapidly bored when i realised there was no talk of either big drops , jumps or a the very least sexy girls
Logged
...Quick go for it now, before your brain catches up with your balls !
Ant
Meta
Posts: 1468
Re: Is 2 x 10 really the way??
«
Reply #11 on:
June 22, 2010, 09:51:38 AM »
Hmm, wonder if anyone has ran a 2x11 yet on an MTB.
Logged
www.AnthonyWillett.com
RAFChris
Meta
Posts: 822
Re: Is 2 x 10 really the way??
«
Reply #12 on:
June 28, 2010, 07:53:05 PM »
Steve, did you catch sight of any of my lot from tha RAF teams? They had a pretty good showing by all accounts. How did you get on?
Logged
What goes up must come down... preferably pinning it!!!
http://www.hookit.com/Members/RAFChris
100mphplus
Meta
Posts: 848
Live the Dream - Whistler 2012 Ticket2rideBC.com
Re: Is 2 x 10 really the way??
«
Reply #13 on:
June 28, 2010, 08:54:43 PM »
Yeh, we saw the service teams, we ended up about 80 odd over all I think.
Logged
Sponsored by;
www.ticket2ridebc.com
- for a 5% discount on your 2012 Whistler Holiday quote the code 'T2R01'
'08 Meta 666, '09 Super 4, '11 Supreme DH V3, '12 Meta AM1
RAFChris
Meta
Posts: 822
Re: Is 2 x 10 really the way??
«
Reply #14 on:
June 28, 2010, 08:56:29 PM »
Cool, sounds like it was a pretty good weekend. You racing any of the SDAs left this year? or concentrating on the BDS and WCs?
Logged
What goes up must come down... preferably pinning it!!!
http://www.hookit.com/Members/RAFChris
Pages:
[
1
]
2
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
General Category
-----------------------------
=> General Discussion
===> Pics & Vids
=> Rides
=> Technical issues
=> Users bikes
=> Buy & Sell
=> News
-----------------------------
Regional forums - To have a regional forum added please private message Steveb
-----------------------------
=> Spain
=> UK & Ireland
=> France
=> Canada
=> America
Loading...
TinyPortal 1.0 RC1
|
© 2005-2010 BlocWeb