Commencal Owners Club
Home Forum Index Help Search Login Register
Neon Orange Neon Green Carbon

User

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 24, 2012, 08:29:01 AM

Login with username, password and session length

Latest Poll

What is the main type of machine you use to surf the site?
Desktop
- 112 (28%)
Laptop
- 158 (40%)
iPhone
- 51 (13%)
Android phone
- 29 (7%)
Tablet
- 24 (6%)
Other
- 14 (3%)
Total Voters: 287
+  Commencal Owners Club
|-+  Forum
| |-+  General Category
| | |-+  General Discussion
| | | |-+  2009 Mini DH
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3] Print
Author Topic: 2009 Mini DH  (Read 17072 times)
steveb
Administrator
Meta
******
Posts: 2004

realcycles
View Profile WWW
« Reply #30 on: May 03, 2008, 03:40:00 PM »

They go uphill extremely well. I regularly ride mine on days that have 5000ft climbing.
Logged

www.realcycles.com
Commencal Dealer Of The Year 2007 & 2008
We ship Commencals all over Europe.
henrykong
Normal
*
Posts: 3


View Profile
« Reply #31 on: May 05, 2008, 01:15:32 PM »

I'll be riding one in a few weeks :-) Least I better be, you reading this Russ? ;-)

As far as I know the weight is much the same, travel is upped a bit, BB, rear axle etc. all the same. But this might all be wrong, it was got from a very short conversation with Max in Feb about it, and I don't think he was paying much attention!


So sweet Tongue, I can exchange all components from 07 to 09 Cheesy
besides, the top tube look like higher than 07, is right???
Logged
twin
Super Normal
***
Posts: 221


View Profile
« Reply #32 on: May 05, 2008, 07:04:53 PM »

the only thing i find slightly odd about it is the ratio in terms of travel front and back. A lot of newer bikes designed for 6 or 7 inch forks run more travel in the rear (6inchs front), the same or more (7 inch front), but not less in the rear. The bikes i'm comparing it to is; sc nomad, sc bullit, cannondale perp, spesh sx, and so on.

It seems like in general commencals dh bikes has less travel in the rear than the competition, but where what travel "limitations" it has doesn't seem to have much/anything to say in terms of what's possible to do/how fast one can go with the bikes. Is that why (fine tuned ratios makes the most of the travel) or is it simply a matter of design philosophy?

That being said, the other day i rode behind a friend of mine who has a cannondale perp (180mm front/200mm rear) and even though he's a better rider than me at the current moment i'm pretty confident that as my riding progresses i will be able to go pretty much equally fast in the type of terrain we rode. Sure, in full out resort dh he'll be able to go faster, but it didn't feel like it was my bike that held me back - far from it - it was def a mix of lack of skills for more agressive dhish riding and new, unfamiliar terrain.

anyway, i'm really looking forward putting my arms/eyes on one and checking it out. After the aforementioned ride my love for the current design/my bike reached new heights. Now fox just needs to get their act together and release a talas fork with 130-160-180mm travel options. The 100mm option of the current design is pretty much useless, but the swap would warrent the best fork ever imo and - provided the frame weight of the new design is as light or lighter than the current - would make for an even more impressive allrounder, though i guess it would still be a bit lacking in the dh compartment. Then again it's a minidh bike, not a dh bike, and one hell of one (minidh bike) too Wink

more travel in the rear, longer seat tube, lower center of gravity, the same great geo of today... man, this is gonna be one hell of a bike!

hm, the only thing that worries me a bit though is the fact that it seems to be designed around a 180mm fork (as the minidh 6.10 will sport one next year). What does this do for the geo with a 160mm fork? less slack than the current? Does this mean a swap for a totem or 66 ata? So many questions, none very important right now and they will all be duely answered in time i guess.

and just to state it again, i do love my supreme fr (minidh)!
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
TinyPortal 1.0 RC1 | © 2005-2010 BlocWeb