User
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email?
May 23, 2012, 03:33:45 PM
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Latest Poll
What is the main type of machine you use to surf the site?
Desktop
112 (28%)
Laptop
158 (40%)
iPhone
51 (13%)
Android phone
29 (7%)
Tablet
24 (6%)
Other
14 (3%)
Total Voters: 287
Commencal Owners Club
Forum
General Category
General Discussion
long, Medium or short.
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
« previous
next »
Pages:
[
1
]
Author
Topic: long, Medium or short. (Read 323 times)
damo
Meta
Posts: 2230
long, Medium or short.
«
on:
February 16, 2009, 10:13:26 PM »
Or8 chaps.
Right, is there anychance that someone could clear this up for me.
What are the difference between long, medium and short cages on rear mech. What are the different uses for them.
Layman's terms will do thanks.
Cheers in advance.
Damo
Logged
2010 Commencal Meta 5.5 VIP
2007 Santa Cruz Chameleon
1975 minge
"We're here for a good time not a long time"
Colin McRae 1968-2007
nunomelo77
Flame
Posts: 316
BIKE PORN EXTRAVAGANZA!
Re: long, Medium or short.
«
Reply #1 on:
February 16, 2009, 11:14:24 PM »
Every rear mech has a cage underneath it to guide the chain with using the jockey wheels. The length of this cage is important and it is generally best to stick with original length your bike came with.
For a Cross Country/All Mountain/Freeride bike, you get the choice of a medium or long cage; a medium cage doesn't hang down as low and therefore is less lightly to get damaged, however will only work if you are running a double chainring setup, which is unusual unless you have a bash ring. The reason for using a long cage is that the chain needs to be able to move a lot more with a triple chainring setup, because of the larger range of gears.
For DH bikes you will definitely need to go for a short (or super short) cage, as the cage needs to be as high as possible and the gear range is smaller and you will only use a single ring.
Always make sure that the mech can compensate for any "chain grow" through the complete suspension movement.
One other thing: SRAM derailleurs have shorter cages than Shimano's!
Logged
"Pain is temporary, glory is eternal"
mc
Administrator
Meta
Posts: 1526
Re: long, Medium or short.
«
Reply #2 on:
February 17, 2009, 03:12:50 AM »
How much the mech sticks down has nothing to do with what length you need. It's just a beneficial result.
The main deciding issue for the minimum length of mech you need, is chain growth.
Chaingrowth is a total of the difference between the small/large ring up front, and the smallest/largest sprocket at the back.
So for example, a twin ring set-up with a 22-32 up front, and a 11-32 on the back, the chain growth is (32-22)+(32-11) or 10 + 21 = 31, which means you need at least a medium length SRAM mech, or short Shimano.
From memory a short cage SRAM is capable of 22tooth chaingrowth, with 32 for medium, and 42 for long.
The main benefit of using the shortest mech possible, is better chain tension. The shorter the mech, the tighter the chain will be, which helps to reduce chainslap and chainsuck.
Logged
www.uk-mtb.com
Pages:
[
1
]
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
General Category
-----------------------------
=> General Discussion
===> Pics & Vids
=> Rides
=> Technical issues
=> Users bikes
=> Buy & Sell
=> News
-----------------------------
Regional forums - To have a regional forum added please private message Steveb
-----------------------------
=> Spain
=> UK & Ireland
=> France
=> Canada
=> America
Loading...
TinyPortal 1.0 RC1
|
© 2005-2010 BlocWeb