Commencal Owners Club
Home Forum Index Help Search Login Register
Neon Orange Neon Green Carbon

User

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 23, 2012, 03:06:57 AM

Login with username, password and session length

Latest Poll

What is the main type of machine you use to surf the site?
Desktop
- 112 (28%)
Laptop
- 158 (40%)
iPhone
- 51 (13%)
Android phone
- 29 (7%)
Tablet
- 24 (6%)
Other
- 14 (3%)
Total Voters: 287
+  Commencal Owners Club
|-+  Forum
| |-+  General Category
| | |-+  General Discussion
| | | |-+  Bikeradar Meta 5.5.2 first test
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: Bikeradar Meta 5.5.2 first test  (Read 599 times)
Snakes
Flame
****
Posts: 438



View Profile
« on: October 22, 2008, 11:15:56 PM »

Link.
Quote
The head angle is 69.5 degrees...
Hmm shouldn't be this year head angle 68 degrees...
« Last Edit: October 22, 2008, 11:21:09 PM by Snakes » Logged
steveb
Administrator
Meta
******
Posts: 2004

realcycles
View Profile WWW
« Reply #1 on: October 23, 2008, 07:34:16 AM »

Ahhh, Mags and their angle finders, here we go again!

Quote
The Meta underwent a radical rear suspension overhaul a year ago

Wow, what happened there then? I thought they just went to a single beam swingarm, didn't realise the whole suspension platform was over hauled too!

Have to say what I always say, Mag reviews are largely pointless, often damn right miss-leading and at worst damaging to a brand. But they say they love the Meta 5.5.2 and that it's a great bike, so on this occasion I'll have to agree with them 100% ;-)

This does not make my decision over what new trail bike any easier. Can't decide between a 5 or 666.

Logged

www.realcycles.com
Commencal Dealer Of The Year 2007 & 2008
We ship Commencals all over Europe.
gammmmo
Super Normal
***
Posts: 100


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: October 23, 2008, 08:58:40 AM »

I'd rather magazines voice some sort of point of view - you don't have to believe them.  Grin
Unlike some of the American magazines where everything is "simply awesome".  Roll Eyes
Logged
mark_s
Normal
*
Posts: 18


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: October 23, 2008, 09:54:46 AM »

Thats probably because the bike manufacturers would sue the reviewers over there for a bad review! Claim loss of sales or some crap rather than admitting problems in their bikes...  Undecided
Logged
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
TinyPortal 1.0 RC1 | © 2005-2010 BlocWeb