User
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email?
May 22, 2012, 06:47:14 PM
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Latest Poll
What is the main type of machine you use to surf the site?
Desktop
112 (28%)
Laptop
158 (40%)
iPhone
51 (13%)
Android phone
29 (7%)
Tablet
24 (6%)
Other
14 (3%)
Total Voters: 287
Commencal Owners Club
Forum
General Category
General Discussion
Fox van r v. Rockshox Lyrik coil
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
« previous
next »
Pages:
[
1
]
Author
Topic: Fox van r v. Rockshox Lyrik coil (Read 4239 times)
tintole
Flame
Posts: 363
Fox van r v. Rockshox Lyrik coil
«
on:
October 05, 2008, 06:46:59 PM »
Hi everyone,
I'm thinking of buying some new forks for my mini dh and have narrowed it down to the Fox van r or the Rockshox Lyrik coil.
Any opinions to which is better, pro's or con's of each fork would be great.
I have found 08 versions of each for about £500 so I can't split them even on price!
Thanks.
Logged
steveb
Administrator
Meta
Posts: 2004
Re: Fox van r v. Rockshox Lyrik coil
«
Reply #1 on:
October 05, 2008, 07:33:35 PM »
Buy both, pull them both apart, decide for yourself which one you'd rather put your faith into. Re-assemble and sell the one with the plastic internals.
If that's not really an option then just buy the Fox's ;-)
Logged
www.realcycles.com
Commencal Dealer Of The Year 2007 & 2008
We ship Commencals all over Europe.
Bippa
Flame
Posts: 352
Re: Fox van r v. Rockshox Lyrik coil
«
Reply #2 on:
October 05, 2008, 07:36:53 PM »
lol @ steve
i went with the vans for my 666, not test ridden them yet though
09s cheapish here...
http://www.rutlandcycling.com/9204/Fox-Shox-36-Van-R.html
Logged
bong69uk
bong one (and a bit) star special
Meta
Posts: 3211
Re: Fox van r v. Rockshox Lyrik coil
«
Reply #3 on:
October 06, 2008, 12:41:08 AM »
how bout a set of domains? or better yet a set of totems?(if ure frame is over 2years old u dont have to worry bout the warranty)
Logged
...Quick go for it now, before your brain catches up with your balls !
tintole
Flame
Posts: 363
Re: Fox van r v. Rockshox Lyrik coil
«
Reply #4 on:
October 06, 2008, 07:26:51 AM »
Hi,
Quote from: bong69uk on October 06, 2008, 12:41:08 AM
how bout a set of domains? or better yet a set of totems?(if ure frame is over 2years old u dont have to worry bout the warranty)
I have found Totems for about £500 also but thought they may be a bit much for the bike. I mainly ride trail centres (dalby, glentress) and some downhill like (wharncliffe, hamsterley) Would totems fit the bill for this? they do look good!
Cheers.
Rob.
Logged
Ant
Meta
Posts: 1468
Re: Fox van r v. Rockshox Lyrik coil
«
Reply #5 on:
October 06, 2008, 04:22:55 PM »
I run lyriks on my mini DH, and it's perfect. (Although the solo air version).
run with the slackest setting on the headtube, and you're away.
Logged
www.AnthonyWillett.com
tintole
Flame
Posts: 363
Re: Fox van r v. Rockshox Lyrik coil
«
Reply #6 on:
October 06, 2008, 05:58:49 PM »
Quote from: Ant on October 06, 2008, 04:22:55 PM
I run lyriks on my mini DH, and it's perfect. (Although the solo air version).
run with the slackest setting on the headtube, and you're away.
My mini dh is the 6.3 without the adjustable headangle, does that mean I'd be better off with the longer totem to slacken the head angle?
I think mine is fixed at 67 degrees.
SteveB may be able to confirm this!
Logged
bong69uk
bong one (and a bit) star special
Meta
Posts: 3211
Re: Fox van r v. Rockshox Lyrik coil
«
Reply #7 on:
October 06, 2008, 06:42:06 PM »
hmm maybe,but without the adjustable headangle it will throw the handling slightly,it will make ure bike slightly less responsive throught the tight technical sections but more manageable on steep or fast descents
. i am hoping to slap on a set of totems after the year,so i hope they suit
i will be checking the axle to crown measurement on them soon,to see how much it differs to my current stock marz 66's. i will let you know when i measure them what the diff is,if any!
or maybe craggle can tell us what the a2c measurement is on the totems? (im sure he had a mini dh with them on it)
Logged
...Quick go for it now, before your brain catches up with your balls !
tintole
Flame
Posts: 363
Re: Fox van r v. Rockshox Lyrik coil
«
Reply #8 on:
October 06, 2008, 07:00:15 PM »
a2c length of fox 36 and lyrik is 545mm
a2c length of totem is 565mm
If I run a totem with a touch more sag I suppose it would be about the same as the 36's or the lyrik.
Maybe a totem then!!
Logged
bong69uk
bong one (and a bit) star special
Meta
Posts: 3211
Re: Fox van r v. Rockshox Lyrik coil
«
Reply #9 on:
October 06, 2008, 10:05:17 PM »
it really comes down to how u want the bilke to handle/feel? do u want a nimble 6" rigg capable of razzing down some dh now and again,or do u want it to be more of a frequent visitor to the dh trails,therefore want a more capable machine that can also be hucked off some decent drops? if u are swaying to the 1st option there then im guessing lyrics or domains should be on the cards,but if u are leaning more towards the latter there(like me
) then the totems should def be on ure shortlist!
Logged
...Quick go for it now, before your brain catches up with your balls !
Cartwheel
Combi
Posts: 51
Re: Fox van r v. Rockshox Lyrik coil
«
Reply #10 on:
October 07, 2008, 04:16:32 AM »
Had fox 36's on my hardtail for the last 2 n a bit years and cant fult them. Cant speak for the Lyrics with never bouncing on a pair but had boxxers for years and wouldnt be in a hurry to go back to them. Just my personal opinion is that fox and mazzocchi are plusher.
Logged
rob1234
Normal
Posts: 25
Re: Fox van r v. Rockshox Lyrik coil
«
Reply #11 on:
October 07, 2008, 03:22:22 PM »
I really cannot recommend Totems enough - slightly slacker headangle not very noticeable tbh, weight difference (if there is any) not noticeable at all. Absolutely superb.
I would caveat this with saying I don't ride it uphill :-)
Logged
2007 Supreme MiniDH 6.20 w/
Saints, LG1, Totems, Swinger 4-way, 2.5" Swampthings
Ant
Meta
Posts: 1468
Re: Fox van r v. Rockshox Lyrik coil
«
Reply #12 on:
October 09, 2008, 12:51:41 AM »
Quote from: tintole on October 06, 2008, 07:00:15 PM
a2c length of fox 36 and lyrik is 545mm
a2c length of totem is 565mm
If I run a totem with a touch more sag I suppose it would be about the same as the 36's or the lyrik.
Maybe a totem then!!
Or add in 1 all travel spacer in the internals, that means dropping the travel to 165mm from 180mm.
And yes, as i've got the adjustable head angle, my head tube is 1 degree more slack than yours as i've got the +/-1deg sleeve in.
Logged
www.AnthonyWillett.com
bong69uk
bong one (and a bit) star special
Meta
Posts: 3211
Re: Fox van r v. Rockshox Lyrik coil
«
Reply #13 on:
October 09, 2008, 11:06:02 AM »
Do you notice much difference in having the head angle set at that ANT? im thinking bout changing mine,im just running it at the stock setting just now.
Logged
...Quick go for it now, before your brain catches up with your balls !
Ant
Meta
Posts: 1468
Re: Fox van r v. Rockshox Lyrik coil
«
Reply #14 on:
October 10, 2008, 11:19:20 PM »
Well, i've only ever ran my mini at the slackest setting, as that was what it was at from the place i got the frame from.
1 degree makes a lot of difference though, slower to turn, but more stable at speed. I love going fast
.
Logged
www.AnthonyWillett.com
Pages:
[
1
]
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
General Category
-----------------------------
=> General Discussion
===> Pics & Vids
=> Rides
=> Technical issues
=> Users bikes
=> Buy & Sell
=> News
-----------------------------
Regional forums - To have a regional forum added please private message Steveb
-----------------------------
=> Spain
=> UK & Ireland
=> France
=> Canada
=> America
Loading...
TinyPortal 1.0 RC1
|
© 2005-2010 BlocWeb